From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-16399-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 9219 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2003 16:42:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 8928 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2003 16:41:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fred.ninemoons.com) (68.14.214.217)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Dec 2003 16:41:58 -0000
Received: from fred.ninemoons.com (fred.ninemoons.com [127.0.0.1])
	by fred.ninemoons.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hB1GflXj010283;
	Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:41:48 -0700
Received: (from fnf@localhost)
	by fred.ninemoons.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hB1GfllT010281;
	Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:41:47 -0700
From: Fred Fish <fnf@public.ninemoons.com>
Message-Id: <200312011641.hB1GfllT010281@fred.ninemoons.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Possible gcc/DWARF or gdb/DWARF problem
To: jimb@redhat.com (Jim Blandy)
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 16:42:00 -0000
Cc: fnf@ninemoons.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Reply-To: fnf@ninemoons.com
In-Reply-To: <vt28ylw5zuh.fsf@zenia.home> from "Jim Blandy" at Dec 01, 2003 10:20:38 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2

> it uses 32-bit stores and loads to fb+0 to access
> it, but that's irrelevant; it's a one-byte value.)  Right?

Correct.

> You're right --- GCC is wrong.

I'll go ahead and file a formal gcc bug report.

-Fred