From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-16362-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 10166 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2003 21:44:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 10153 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2003 21:44:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO tisch.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.157)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 2003 21:44:12 -0000
Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com)
	by tisch.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 1AP7Rm-0000FY-00; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:43:42 -0500
Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 626764B40B; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:43:41 -0500 (EST)
To: drow@mvista.com, ian@wasabisystems.com
Subject: Re: C++/Java regressions
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Message-Id: <20031126214341.626764B40B@berman.michael-chastain.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 21:44:00 -0000
From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)
X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00269.txt.bz2

ian> Yes, I think it should print A::bar without the const.  I have the
ian> patch in my sources, but I haven't checked it in yet.

But what about:

  class Foo
  {
    public:
      int method ();
      int method () const;
  };

If the name comes back as "Foo::method" then we have ambiguity
in gdb's output.

I think the const looks ugly and the code that prints the function
name is also ugly.  But I don't wanna print the same name for two
different methods.

Michael C