From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-16287-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 7757 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2003 14:52:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 7750 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2003 14:52:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Nov 2003 14:52:07 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hALEq7H10518
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:52:07 -0500
Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hALEq6w27942;
	Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:52:06 -0500
Received: from deneb.localdomain (msalter.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.36])
	by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hALEq6HT018890;
	Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:52:06 -0500
Received: by deneb.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id 155B87879F; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:52:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
To: manojv@noida.hcltech.com
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <1B3885BC15C7024C845AAC78314766C50103348D@EXCH-01>
	(manojv@noida.hcltech.com)
Subject: Re: remote debugging packets
References:  <1B3885BC15C7024C845AAC78314766C50103348D@EXCH-01>
Message-Id: <20031121145206.155B87879F@deneb.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:52:00 -0000
X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00194.txt.bz2

>>>>> Manoj Verma, Noida writes:

>> > 2) On the Gdb client side when I continue, "(gdb) 
>> continue", why it first
>> > sends a packet ($s#73...Ack) and then the packet 
>> ($c#63...Ack) as shown
>> > below in sanpshot-2 ? It should only send the packet ($c#63...Ack).
>> 
>> This is expected. GDB has to single-step past the one machine 
>> instruction
>> before re-inserting any breakpoints and continuing.
>> 

> But consider the scenario when I have breakpoints set on two consecutive
> lines. Will in this case also this behavior is justified?

It is certainly correct behavior. I don't see any problem with
your scenario.

--Mark