From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26930 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2003 15:33:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26921 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2003 15:33:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO maynard.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.243) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Nov 2003 15:33:53 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by maynard.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1ALOuM-0006Ra-00; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 10:33:50 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id DC8B34B408; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 10:33:54 -0500 (EST) To: carlton@kealia.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB regressions Message-Id: <20031116153354.DC8B34B408@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:33:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00121.txt.bz2 David Carlton writes: > I just did a CVS update, and I got a whole bunch of regressions. I'll > include the diff of the gdb.sums after my signatures; these have all > appeared since Wednesday some time. Just for a data point, I just finished a test spin and I didn't see this happening. I have native i686-pc-linux-gnu, red hat linux 8, vendor glibc without debugging symbols. Michael C