From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2983 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2003 04:46:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2975 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2003 04:46:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO barry.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Nov 2003 04:46:01 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AKsJo-0007iP-00; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 23:45:56 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 299844B3FA; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 23:45:50 -0500 (EST) To: carlton@kealia.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB regressions Message-Id: <20031115044550.299844B3FA@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 04:46:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00117.txt.bz2 This is not ringing any bells in my cache. I'm doing a spin tonight and I'll have my next report in about 15 hours, plus the time it takes me to write the report (which might be a bit longer). Let's see if I see something similar with my red hat linux 8.0. Meanwhile, do you still have the gdb.log from the bad test run? Can you mail that to me? Michael C