From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20403 invoked by alias); 2 Nov 2003 21:53:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20356 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2003 21:53:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bristol.phunnypharm.org) (65.207.35.130) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Nov 2003 21:53:07 -0000 Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 21:53:00 -0000 From: Ben Collins To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Progress on SPARC Message-ID: <20031102213147.GG7904@phunnypharm.org> References: <200311022104.hA2L4mit081014@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200311022104.hA2L4mit081014@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2 On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 10:04:48PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Thanks to Ben Collins and the Debian project, I've completed the > 64-bit GNU/Linux SPARC support. In order to debug 64-bit code you'll > need to compile GDB with a compiler that produces 64-bit code. If you > use a 32-bit compiler and configure for sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu > anyway, you'll probably end up with a debugger that doesn't work. > I'll see if I can fix that later. > > There is also some support for 64-bit Solaris SPARC on the branch now, > but I don't know if it'll work. > > I still have to revicve NetBSD (both 32-bit and 64-bit) before I can > merge this stuff into mainline. Does the 64-bit gdb support debugging 32-bit binaries? I ask, because Dave Miller's work getting GDB to support 64-bit sparc binaries did in fact support debugging 32-bit binaries. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/