From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB's command qualifier character is `/'
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 00:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031020003248.GA20365@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F92C0D2.6050807@gnu.org>
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:50:26PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> This seems to keep comming up, sigh!
>
> GDB's CLI, long ago established `/' as its command qualifier character vis:
>
> x/i
> display/i
> print/x
>
> GDB's user base is very familar with this syntax(1) so adding new
> qualfiers using this syntax would provide a consistent user experience
> (if there is x/i, how come there isn't "info break/l"?).
>
> In fact, in the case of all these specific commands (including "info
> break/l") trying to switch to UNIX's option syntax vis:
>
> x --i
>
> would be a disaster!
I stand by my previous disagreement with this position.
All of the currently accepted / options that I can find are output
format qualifiers. I find nothing strange or inconsistent about using
a different syntax for options and for output qualifiers. GDB doesn't
have any examples of
break /shlib libc.so.6 round
or
break /shlib:libc.so.6 round
only
print/x round
I don't think x/i is prior art for break /shlib.
> What's unfortunate in all this is that the current CLI code doesn't
> directly parse the qualifier convention. For instance:
>
> (gdb) x<TAB>
> x/i x/b x/8 x/4
> and
> (gdb) load/vma /lma
> (load, using vma addresses, the file "/lma").
Yes, this is unfortunate - at least in the minor bit that it generates
some strange error messages. Almost nothing is centrally parsed in the
CLI and that's a shame.
> (1) Personally, I'm always using the `/' qualifier, but I can't remember
> when, if ever, I used one of the UNIX style command options.
That's because there are very few commands in all of GDB's CLI which
_take_ options. /, -, or otherwise.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-20 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-19 16:50 Andrew Cagney
2003-10-20 0:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-10-21 19:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-22 9:56 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-10-22 14:38 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-20 21:54 ` Jim Blandy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031020003248.GA20365@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox