From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10544 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2003 18:44:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10516 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2003 18:44:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Oct 2003 18:44:24 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h9FIiMbv006160; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 13:44:22 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9FIiMfa024258; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 13:44:22 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id h9FIiLUJ024257; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:44:21 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 18:44:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200310151844.h9FIiLUJ024257@duracef.shout.net> To: ezannoni@redhat.com, kettenis@chello.nl Subject: Re: SOFUN_ADDRESS_MAYBE_MISSING Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00203.txt.bz2 eza> I tried *deleting* the definition of SOFUN_ADDRESS_.. in eza> config/i386/tm-linux.h, and I ran the testsuite both on a stabs platform eza> (RH 7.3) and a dwarf2 platform (RH 9) and found no differences in the eza> testsuite results, before and after the change (of course there are eza> the usual differences between the stabs and the dwarf2 runs). BTW, you might already know this, but you can run stabs+ on RH 9 with: runtest ... --target_board unix/gdb:debug_flags=-gstabs+ I don't know the right incantation for doing this at the "make check" level. eza> This would require to increase the size of a minsym in all eza> cases, by making this unconditional: My data point is that minsym size is not important: about 0.3 megabytes out of 80 megabytes with "gdb --readnow gdb". Dunno about the normal case without "--readnow" but I wouldn't worry about increasing the size of a minsym if that helps fix a problem. My two superficial observations, Michael C