From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15436 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2003 21:56:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15427 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2003 21:56:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Sep 2003 21:56:55 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h8PLuks5028228; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 16:56:46 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8PLukVd005080; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 16:56:46 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id h8PLukiQ005079; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:56:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 22:13:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200309252156.h8PLukiQ005079@duracef.shout.net> To: ac131313@redhat.com, dejagnu@gnu.org Subject: Re: Print KFAIL's in dejagnu summary? Cc: fnasser@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00318.txt.bz2 ac> At present KFAILs are supressed from the summary output (the stuff on ac> the terminal from "make check"). I'd like to change this so that ac> KFAILs, just like FAILs, are included in the summary. A KFAIL, just ac> like a FAIL, indicates a bug in the system under test, and hence should ac> be included in the summary. I would really like this. My scripts treat every non-PASS result as an item of interest, so I don't miss anything. For some actual counts: http://www.shout.net/~mec/sunday/2003-09-22/Counts.html Michael C