From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9008 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2003 21:18:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8864 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2003 21:18:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2003 21:18:24 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h8MLIK5W029801; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:18:20 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8MLIKVd009007; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:18:20 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id h8MLIK4t009006; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 17:18:20 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:18:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200309222118.h8MLIK4t009006@duracef.shout.net> To: jingham@apple.com, shebs@apple.com Subject: Re: Apple and gcc 2? Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00282.txt.bz2 Excellent, this covers GCC 2 for Apple for my survey. gcc 2 is very much alive in the field. I've made a note to come back in 3-6 months with another survey. Personally, I think it will be 18-30 months before gdb HEAD can drop gcc 2 support. Michael C