From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20485 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2003 22:06:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20478 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2003 22:06:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2003 22:06:02 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h8JM5uHt031890; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 17:05:56 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8JM5uVd021502; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 17:05:56 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id h8JM5uMX021501; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 18:05:56 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 22:06:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200309192205.h8JM5uMX021501@duracef.shout.net> To: jingham@apple.com Subject: Re: Apple and gcc 2? Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00246.txt.bz2 > I can't really speak to this. I don't really know if/when we are going > to drop support for compiling kext's with 2.95. That's cool. My survey shows a surprising number of gcc 2 platforms. We got a bug report on bug-gdb today from someone who uses gdb 5.3 and egcs 2.91.66! Michael C