From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-15581-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 19545 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2003 20:54:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 19525 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2003 20:54:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2003 20:54:44 -0000
Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12])
	by concert.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h8JKsfHt020373;
	Fri, 19 Sep 2003 15:54:41 -0500
Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8JKsfVd020288;
	Fri, 19 Sep 2003 15:54:41 -0500
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id h8JKsfvL020287;
	Fri, 19 Sep 2003 16:54:41 -0400
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 20:54:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200309192054.h8JKsfvL020287@duracef.shout.net>
To: jingham@apple.com
Subject: Re: Apple and gcc 2?
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00244.txt.bz2

jim> For obscure reasons some people who build Kernel Extensions still use 
jim> gcc 2.95, so it will still be provided with the next release of the 
jim> Developer tools.  But we don't advise using it for anything else.

Okay.  Does gdb work with Kernel Extensions?

(Obviously where I'm going with this is: figuring out when gdb
can drop support for gcc 2).

Michael C