From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28210 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2003 18:16:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28198 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2003 18:16:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2003 18:16:54 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h8JIGpHt025175; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:16:51 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8JIGpVd018025; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:16:51 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id h8JIGp86018024; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:16:51 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 18:16:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200309191816.h8JIGp86018024@duracef.shout.net> To: gdb@sources.redhat.com, jingham@apple.com Subject: Apple and gcc 2? X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00240.txt.bz2 Hi Jim, and any other Apple gdb folks, I'm putting together a report on systems that still use gcc 2. For the curious, the one-line list is: gcc 2: openbsd, netbsd, freebsd, debian, lindows, xandros, lycoris, sco I don't know anything about Apple. Does Apple have any gcc 2 users in the field? Michael C