Re: RFC: Two small remote protocol extensions

Andrew Cagney
2002-05-05T02:59:16Z

> are, only marginally different.
>>
>> Should all threads be halted during this exchange? I think that is a
>> separate question.
>
>
> I wouldn't call it effectively synchronous - precisely because no other
> thread is stopped. All threads shouldn't be halted, IMO, but I have
> no way to tell GDB which are and which are not.

No/yes? The protocol is effectivly synchronous in both cases.

Separate to this, GDB could be modified to not assume all threads
stopped when a new thread is created. This change can equally be
implemented for a local/native and/or a remote target - something
separate from the remote protocol.

enjoy,
Andrew