From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13828 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2003 16:04:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13813 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2003 16:04:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Sep 2003 16:04:52 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian)) id 19zIJv-0007ej-Nr for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 12:04:51 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:04:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: "Gdb@Sources.Redhat.Com" Subject: Re: gdb GNATS database Message-ID: <20030916160451.GA28698@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Gdb@Sources.Redhat.Com" References: <066601c37c6b$d2b02550$0202040a@catdog> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <066601c37c6b$d2b02550$0202040a@catdog> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00199.txt.bz2 On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 12:01:43PM -0400, Kris Warkentin wrote: > Who is responsible for the bug database? We were bit by PR:1291 and I > wouldn't mind taking ownership of it. The patch included with the PR works > for gcc 3.x but not 2.95x. We solved the problem for the 2 series gcc and > have generalized the patch to work with both compiler versions. > > I'll be preparing a patch for the head branch over the next little bit but I > wanted to know if there was anything special to be done in relation to the > PR. No one owns it. Do you have a GNATS account? You should have gotten one when you got CVS access - otherwise ask overseers. Hmm, you're in the list of accounts. That doesn't mean you ever were sent the password :) -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer