From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25735 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2003 00:01:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25728 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2003 00:01:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Sep 2003 00:01:02 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian)) id 19ygne-00007b-Fa for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 20:01:02 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 00:01:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: rolling 5.3.92 tomorrow Message-ID: <20030915000102.GA410@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <3F60852B.50205@redhat.com> <3F64FECC.30201@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F64FECC.30201@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00192.txt.bz2 On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 07:50:36PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >FYI, > > > >Assuming that there aren't any more crasher bugs and the current ones are > >in, I'll roll up another draft 6.0 tomorrow. Hopefully, after that, I'll > >be able to roll out the real thing early next week. > > Well that didn't happen, I'll try again in a few hours or tomorrow ... > > >I would love to have the Java assertion patch on the branch. > >It's a very localized patch -- it just changes the order of > >two tests, really. It's easy to verify that it can't break > >anything. And on the upside, it fixes a crash bug. > > which Java assertion patch? I moved it over this morning - the one for dwarf2-frame.c. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer