From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24117 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2003 18:36:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24110 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2003 18:36:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Sep 2003 18:36:20 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian)) id 19ybjQ-0002k6-Hw for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 14:36:20 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:36:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: rolling 5.3.92 tomorrow Message-ID: <20030914183620.GA10517@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <3F60852B.50205@redhat.com> <20030911143737.GA22554@nevyn.them.org> <16224.47306.505238.29547@localhost.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16224.47306.505238.29547@localhost.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00189.txt.bz2 On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 02:02:50PM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 10:22:35AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > FYI, > > > > > > Assuming that there aren't any more crasher bugs and the current ones > > > are in, I'll roll up another draft 6.0 tomorrow. Hopefully, after that, > > > I'll be able to roll out the real thing early next week. > > > > Great. I have one patch left to check in (ctx->in_reg), I'll do that > > today. > > > > The only other issue I know of is that Mark's per-objfile-data patch, > > and my fix for the assertion failures in Java, aren't on the branch > > yet. Should we move those patches over? > > > > I don't see why not. They didn't cause any problems in the trunk. I've done this now. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer