From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30795 invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2003 00:40:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30788 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2003 00:40:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Sep 2003 00:40:34 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8D0eW9Q018897; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 19:40:32 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8D0eWHK029197; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 19:40:32 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h8D0eWMv029196; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 20:40:32 -0400 Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 00:40:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200309130040.h8D0eWMv029196@duracef.shout.net> To: cgf@redhat.com Subject: Re: gcc HEAD bad stabs (?) Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00178.txt.bz2 cgf> You seem to be discounting the impact of email which summarizes a trend. cgf> Everyone knows that gcc is getting slower and slower, too. There may cgf> even be bugs filed against that fact. But often when someone posts hard cgf> facts showing the trend, there is a flurry of interest and activity. I'm cgf> sure that the gdb community would respond similarly. You are right; I didn't think of it that way. I'm still at the annoying stage where I see a problem but I don't like any suggestions for fixing it, even when I ask for them. Mmmm, sorry about that. At least we're all aware there is a problem now; and some specific PR's are getting fixed in gcc land. Michael C