From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-15501-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 17036 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2003 23:58:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 17029 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2003 23:58:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Sep 2003 23:58:47 -0000
Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12])
	by concert.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8BNwj9Q014003;
	Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:58:45 -0500
Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8BNwjHK010616;
	Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:58:45 -0500
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h8BNwjjZ010615;
	Thu, 11 Sep 2003 19:58:45 -0400
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 23:58:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200309112358.h8BNwjjZ010615@duracef.shout.net>
To: ezannoni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: tls tests on gdb-6?
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00164.txt.bz2

eza> What's the thought about putting the tls tests into the gdb-6 branch?
eza> yes/no/indifferent?

I would rather not, on the principle of "don't shake the jello"

But I guess it really depends on whether TLS support is an advertised
feature of gdb 6.0.  I am hoping that it's not.

Michael C