From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31785 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2003 02:04:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31654 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2003 02:04:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakemtao04.cox.net) (68.1.17.241) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Sep 2003 02:04:30 -0000 Received: from white ([68.9.191.65]) by lakemtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20030911020431.XAJQ29227.lakemtao04.cox.net@white> for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:04:31 -0400 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19xGov-0004jf-00 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:04:29 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 02:04:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: vast numbers of unimplemented MI commands. Message-ID: <20030911020429.GF17937@white> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00145.txt.bz2 Hi, I just was looking through the MI commands. Many of them in mi-cmds.c are unimplemented. Is this how 6.0 will be released? or will most of them get implemented first? Also, how does eclipse interface with MI if so many commands are missing? For example, -file-list-exec-source-files returns all of the source files that the inferior is made up of. Does eclipse just not give the user this info, or would it parse the CLI output? I am bringing this up because I plan on starting my own MI integration and ran into this problem. I would be willing to help implement any of these missing commands, but I was just wondering if there is any incentive on the GDB team to finish off the task. Bob Rossi