From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20116 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2003 00:18:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20101 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2003 00:18:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO baradas.org) (66.166.225.55) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Sep 2003 00:18:16 -0000 Received: by baradas.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 95A739899C; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 20:18:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Peter Barada To: drow@mvista.com Cc: pbarada@mail.wm.sps.mot.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com, libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20030909213003.GA5878@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 9 Sep 2003 17:30:03 -0400) Subject: Re: Trouble with gdbserver from gdb-5.3, glibc-2.3.2 on ppc32 References: <200309092031.h89KVsI30886@hyper.wm.sps.mot.com> <20030909212241.GA5521@nevyn.them.org> <20030909213003.GA5878@nevyn.them.org> Message-Id: <20030910001816.95A739899C@baradas.org> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 00:18:00 -0000 X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00129.txt.bz2 >Amusingly, after writing that message, I just got: >warning: Cannot initialize thread debugging library: unknown thread_db error '22' > >on my native setup. This happens when debugging a particular >statically linked executable that was built against a different version >of linuxthreads than is present on my host. Is that binary statically >linked? No, its dynamically linked. -- Peter Barada peter@baradas.org