From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
To: drow@mvista.com
Cc: ac131313@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Register sets
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 22:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200309042207.h84M759T034346@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030904151338.GA5328@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Thu, 4 Sep 2003 11:13:39 -0400)
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 11:13:39 -0400
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
> >>As for the architecture, supply_regset needs this. It might, for
> >>instance, be an x86-64 method supplying registers to an i386 register
> >>cache.
> >
> >
> >It needs the regcache's architecture, but I don't believe it needs any
> >other. The method will be defined for a particular regcache layout,
> >which incorporates all of the information it needs about the other
> >involved architecture. We could get the regcache's architecture from
> >the regcache, or pass it explicitly.
>
> That's the architecture mark was passing in. The alternative is a
> larger table of regcache X regset maps.
No, Mark was passing in the core's architecture != the regcache's
architecture.
Indeed I was, and it's the wrong thing to do.
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-04 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-23 22:50 Mark Kettenis
2003-08-24 16:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-25 22:35 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-08-26 15:49 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-08-26 16:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-27 3:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-08-31 14:04 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-09-02 18:40 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-04 21:31 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-09-04 12:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-04 14:00 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-04 14:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-04 15:04 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-04 15:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-04 22:07 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2003-09-04 22:05 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-09-04 22:16 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-04 22:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-05 23:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-09 4:21 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-04 21:58 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-09-06 0:02 ` Jim Blandy
2003-09-06 14:18 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-09-09 4:51 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-09 17:15 ` Jim Blandy
2003-09-09 19:16 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-08-29 20:20 ` Mark Kettenis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200309042207.h84M759T034346@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org \
--to=kettenis@chello.nl \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox