From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21761 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2003 02:42:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21747 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2003 02:42:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Sep 2003 02:42:39 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian)) id 19uNbT-0001FB-1r; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 22:42:39 -0400 Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 02:42:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 5.3.91 available Message-ID: <20030903024238.GA2423@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200309030236.h832aZ2G032503@duracef.shout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200309030236.h832aZ2G032503@duracef.shout.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:36:35PM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > ac> GDB 5.3.91 (a pre-release of GDB 6.0) is available for download. > ac> ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/gdb/snapshots/branch/ > > Just shoot me ... > > First gcc HEAD ICE's during in the bootstrap. When I go to > date-search it, I find two different dates with two different ICE's. > No idea when gcc HEAD will be available for testing again. > > So I back up to an old version of gcc HEAD, and my BuildGcc.pl coughs up: > > assembler not found: /berman/fsf/_today_/berman/install/target/native/binutils/HEAD/bin/as at /berman/home/mgnu/migbat/BuildGcc.pl line 128. > > That's funny, I wonder if I screwed up my scripts. > > [mgnu@berman _today_]$ ls /berman/fsf/_today_/berman/install/target/native/binutils/HEAD/bin/ > addr2line ld readelf > ar nm size > c++filt objcopy strings > gprof objdump strip > i686-pc-linux-gnu-as ranlib > > That ain't cool. It looks like binutils HEAD has a regression bug > in the name handling for installing 'as'. > > Fortunately, regression-searching binutils is a lot easier than > regression-searching gcc. In fact someone is likely to say 'aha' > before I even get a proper bug write-up. It's either my fault or my fault and the autoconf author's fault. Please send me a config.log. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer