From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20475 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2003 02:36:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20456 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2003 02:36:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Sep 2003 02:36:35 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h832aZYI003597; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 21:36:35 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h832aZHK032504; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 21:36:35 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h832aZ2G032503; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 22:36:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 02:36:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200309030236.h832aZ2G032503@duracef.shout.net> To: gdb@sources.redhat.com, gdbadmin@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 5.3.91 available X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2 ac> GDB 5.3.91 (a pre-release of GDB 6.0) is available for download. ac> ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/gdb/snapshots/branch/ Just shoot me ... First gcc HEAD ICE's during in the bootstrap. When I go to date-search it, I find two different dates with two different ICE's. No idea when gcc HEAD will be available for testing again. So I back up to an old version of gcc HEAD, and my BuildGcc.pl coughs up: assembler not found: /berman/fsf/_today_/berman/install/target/native/binutils/HEAD/bin/as at /berman/home/mgnu/migbat/BuildGcc.pl line 128. That's funny, I wonder if I screwed up my scripts. [mgnu@berman _today_]$ ls /berman/fsf/_today_/berman/install/target/native/binutils/HEAD/bin/ addr2line ld readelf ar nm size c++filt objcopy strings gprof objdump strip i686-pc-linux-gnu-as ranlib That ain't cool. It looks like binutils HEAD has a regression bug in the name handling for installing 'as'. Fortunately, regression-searching binutils is a lot easier than regression-searching gcc. In fact someone is likely to say 'aha' before I even get a proper bug write-up. At least my test bed is doing its job of exposing bugs. :) But it might be a while before I can test gdb 5.3.91. :( Michael C