From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7775 invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2003 17:42:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7710 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2003 17:42:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.153) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Aug 2003 17:42:10 -0000 Received: from doctormoo (syr-24-58-120-156.twcny.rr.com [24.58.120.156]) by ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h7THg6cT001131; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:42:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by doctormoo (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BD7A144114; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:42:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 17:42:00 -0000 To: kelleycook@wideopenwest.com, zack@codesourcery.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: The use of the toplevel ChangeLog and config/ChangeLog Message-ID: <20030829174204.GA5195@twcny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: neroden@twcny.rr.com (Nathanael Nerode) X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00331.txt.bz2 >Kelley Cook writes: >> a) There remains a separate config/ChangeLog and all the config/ >> changes be documented only in there. >> >> b) All changes to the config/ directory be documented in the toplevel >> directory and there not be a config/ChangeLog. >> >> Of course, it is quite possible, that am I missing something and there >> is a reason that some go in one ChangeLog and some in the other? >> >> Anyway I'll volunteer to clean up the ChangeLog(s), if everyone can >> come to an agreement of which way it should go. Personally, I would >> think that the ChangeLog in the toplevel should be good enough. Zack Weinberg writes: >I vote (a), because there is legitimate reason for the top-level >ChangeLogs in src/ and gcc/ not to be identical, but the config/ >directory is supposed to be kept precisely in sync between the two >repositories. Therefore keeping a separate changelog for that >directory ensures that changes will stay documented in both >repositories. (a) is correct. :-) -- Nathanael Nerode http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html