From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 598 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2003 03:13:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 589 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2003 03:13:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Aug 2003 03:13:11 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7N3D2Wn007037; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 22:13:02 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7N3D2HK021454; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 22:13:02 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h7N3D2P3021453; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 23:13:02 -0400 Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 03:13:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200308230313.h7N3D2P3021453@duracef.shout.net> To: fedor@doc.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Adding patches to 6.0 branch X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00268.txt.bz2 For what it's worth, the patch is already in gdb HEAD since 2003-08-02, and hasn't drawn any complaints from my test bed. That certainly doesn't mean "yes", however. I saw the name 'linespec.c' and I laughed out loud. Michael C high strung tester === 2003-08-02 Adam Fedor * linespec.c (is_objc_method_format): New function (decode_line_1, locate_first_half): Use it. Fixes PR objc/1298