From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12671 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2003 21:56:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12660 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2003 21:56:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Jul 2003 21:56:13 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.20 #1 (Debian)) id 19hyvc-00045j-85 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 17:56:12 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:56:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: GDB Subject: Re: Does DW_OP_deref work? Message-ID: <20030730215612.GB15640@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: GDB References: <20030730215421.GA26408@lucon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030730215421.GA26408@lucon.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00353.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 02:54:21PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > Does DW_OP_deref work correctly with gdb? That depends on the context. Things that use decode_locdesc, probably not. As we find time, things are being converted to the full expression evaluator. Location descriptions and frame bases should work. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer