From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 666 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2003 01:39:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 640 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2003 01:39:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Jul 2003 01:39:23 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6U1dHin025812; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 20:39:17 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6U1dHHK021290; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 20:39:17 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6U1dHjt021289; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 21:39:17 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 01:39:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200307300139.h6U1dHjt021289@duracef.shout.net> To: drow@mvista.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, geoffk@apple.com Subject: Re: Fwd: Two possible function stabs patches X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00335.txt.bz2 Geoff> Could someone help me test these? It needs a machine that can use Geoff> stabs and on which the GDB testsuite doesn't give too many false Geoff> positives. Two test runs coming up! I'm going to presume that these are insensitive to the binutils version and just use binutils 2.14 (as opposed to the ensemble of four different binutils). Daniel J, that is a safe assumption, right? Michael C