From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20286 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2003 22:38:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20275 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2003 22:38:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Jul 2003 22:38:16 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19f5lu-0002fx-00; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 18:38:14 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 22:38:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Snyder Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, cagney@redhat.com Subject: Re: "store.exp" test Message-ID: <20030722223814.GA10263@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , gdb@sources.redhat.com, cagney@redhat.com References: <3F1DB432.8080500@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F1DB432.8080500@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00291.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 03:01:22PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote: > Andrew, > > A minor problem with the store.c test -- it gets unexpected results > on targets where "char" is unsigned. > > I tried using "register signed char", and that seems to help... > but I'm not sure if that will interfere with the intent of the test. > > Michael Are you working from HEAD or a slightly older branch? I fixed this for arm-elf about two weeks ago, I think. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer