From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27630 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2003 16:12:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27622 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2003 16:12:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Jul 2003 16:12:17 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19dXq8-0004pr-00; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:12:12 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 16:12:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Tom Tromey Cc: David Carlton , gdb Subject: Re: GDB and Java Message-ID: <20030718161212.GB18488@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Tom Tromey , David Carlton , gdb References: <87smp3esha.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87smp3esha.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00249.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 09:59:13AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "David" == David Carlton writes: > > David> Tom, I just committed a large GDB patch that, among other things, > David> touches the dynamic class symbol part of jv-lang.c. Can you give > David> current mainline a whirl to make sure that I didn't screw anything up? > > I said I'd do this a while back, and I wanted to let you know I didn't > forget -- but also that I can't easily do it. I'm using RHL 9, and my > understanding is that the NPTL patches aren't in main line gdb yet. > At least, when I tried debugging with the cvs gdb a couple weeks back, > I had no end of troubles. So, sorry about that. It should, mostly, work now. I'm not sure what the remaining issues are, but the NPTL patches were added. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer