Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
To: ac131313@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: my 6.0 todo list
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200307171435.h6HEZ7sb013840@duracef.shout.net> (raw)

On my list:

  gdb backtrace bugs
    http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1250
    http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1253
    http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1255

  dejagnu build issue
    http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/708

  red hat linux 9
    elena z how is it going?

Off the top of my head, my test bed isn't producing any regressions
besides the backtrace bugs.  But I won't swear that it is clean until
I get out the microscope though.

From my last "5.3 versus HEAD" report,

  MI issues
    how is MI these days?

  x86-64 regressions
    how is it these days?

  multi-register variables
    fixed!

  java regression
    fixed!

  gcc HEAD -gstabs+
    The nastiest pr, gcc/10055, got fixed in gcc.

    There are other regressions with gcc HEAD with both dwarf-2 and
    stabs+ but this does not stop a gdb release.

I will put out a "5.3 versus gdb_6_0-branch" report next week.
I've been hoping for some of the backtrace bugs to get fixed first.

Michael C


             reply	other threads:[~2003-07-17 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-17 14:35 Michael Elizabeth Chastain [this message]
2003-07-17 15:37 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-07-17 15:46 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-07-17 16:38   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-18 18:57 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
     [not found] <200307171542.LAA13377@smtp.ott.qnx.com>
2003-07-18 13:00 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-07-18 22:54 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-07-17 16:50 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-07-18  6:41 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-07-17 16:47 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-07-16 23:38 Andrew Cagney
2003-07-17 15:42 ` Alain Magloire

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200307171435.h6HEZ7sb013840@duracef.shout.net \
    --to=mec@shout.net \
    --cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox