From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-14767-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 9519 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2003 03:39:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 9508 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2003 03:39:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Jul 2003 03:39:27 -0000
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 19cGes-00055V-00; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 23:39:18 -0400
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 03:39:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: "Pavoori, Kiran" <kiran.pavoori@polycom.com>
Cc: "'gdb@sources.redhat.com'" <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: nested namespace and enum
Message-ID: <20030715033918.GA19528@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: "Pavoori, Kiran" <kiran.pavoori@polycom.com>,
	"'gdb@sources.redhat.com'" <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
References: <5314B62255397440B12213B31CB2E9F113CD32@corpmail02>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5314B62255397440B12213B31CB2E9F113CD32@corpmail02>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00158.txt.bz2

On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 10:46:19AM -0700, Pavoori, Kiran wrote:
> Would like to hear an opinion on this declaration.
> 
> namespace N
> {
> class C 
> {
>     public:
>         ~C(){}
>         C() {}
>         typedef enum 
>         {
>                 EV_X,
>                 EV_Y, 
>                 EV_Z
>         } Events;
> };
> }
> 
> 
> Now looking at the above declaration I would access the enum EV_X as
> follows:
> 
> N::C::EV_X
> 
> Is this an acceptable declaration?
> Please comment when you get a chance, thank-you
> Kiran

This does not work in GDB right now, and will not for at least another
release.  It may also require some compiler changes.  Your C++ is right
though.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer