From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-14703-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 16882 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2003 14:20:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 16862 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2003 14:20:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Jul 2003 14:20:45 -0000
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged))
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h69EKjH22292
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 10:20:45 -0400
Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15])
	by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h69EKcS23164
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 10:20:39 -0400
Received: from cygbert.vinschen.de (vpn50-7.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.7])
	by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h69EKbK09969
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 07:20:37 -0700
Received: by cygbert.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id 0665B580A1; Wed,  9 Jul 2003 16:20:35 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 14:20:00 -0000
From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: A matter of taste?
Message-ID: <20030709142035.GR12368@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
References: <20030709135543.GO12368@cygbert.vinschen.de> <jeisqbokq7.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <jeisqbokq7.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00094.txt.bz2

On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 04:09:20PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> If you don't define REGISTER_RAW_SIZE then it is defined to
> generic_register_size, which uses TYPE_LENGTH.

Uh, I failed to notice that.  The check for 0 pointer in
gdbarch_deprecated_register_raw_size led me to believe that
deprecated_register_raw_size is initialized to 0.

Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Developer
Red Hat, Inc.
mailto:vinschen@redhat.com