Re: status of NTPL patches

J. Johnston
2003-06-27T17:49:51Z

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 12:17:20PM -0400, J. Johnston wrote:
>
>>Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 08:48:04AM -0700, David Carlton wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>What's the status of the NTPL patches? Are they all in mainline yet?
>>>>I'm about to sync my branch with mainline, and I'm curious if I'm
>>>>allowed to tell my local users that it's okay to use it with Red Hat
>>>>9.0 yet.
>>>
>>>
>>>I believe that it should work.
>>>
>>
>>They are all committed except for Michael's rewrite of the gcore patch
>>which I haven't
>>seen a commit notice for yet. I don't see any reason it can't be checked
>>in - Michael?
>
>
> Do you mean:
> 2003-06-19 Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
>
> * linux-nat.h: New file.
> * linux-nat.c: Include linux-nat.h.
> * lin-lwp.c: Include linux-nat.h.
> Move struct lwp_info def to linux-nat.h.
> * linux-proc.c: Include linux-nat.h.
> (linux_make_note_section): Iterate over lwps instead of threads.
> (linux_do_thread_registers): Use lwp instead of merged pid.
> * config/nm-linux.h: Move miscelaneous def'ns to linux-nat.h.
> * Makefile.in (lin-lwp.o, linux-proc.o, linux-nat.o):
> Add dependency on linux_nat_h.
>
> ?
>

Yes. Didn't see a post about it being committed. Thanks.

-- Jeff J.