From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23449 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2003 16:30:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23419 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2003 16:30:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neon-gw.transmeta.com) (63.209.4.196) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Jun 2003 16:30:15 -0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by neon-gw.transmeta.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA28274; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 09:30:11 -0700 Received: from mailhost.transmeta.com(10.1.1.15) by neon-gw.transmeta.com via smap (V2.1) id xma028241; Fri, 20 Jun 03 09:30:06 -0700 Received: from casey.transmeta.com (casey.transmeta.com [10.10.25.22]) by deepthought.transmeta.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5KGU8B06024; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 09:30:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dje@localhost) by casey.transmeta.com (8.9.3/8.7.3) id JAA08891; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 09:30:08 -0700 Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 16:30:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200306201630.JAA08891@casey.transmeta.com> From: Doug Evans To: gdb@sources.redhat.com cc: wilson@tuliptree.org Subject: regenerating cgen sim sources for gdb 6.0 X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00415.txt.bz2 I wrote: > I've already verified that there's no regressions in the > gcc testsuite from gcc top-of-tree sources (as of a few days ago) > with the before/after i960-coff-run simulator. ... and the m32r changes are minimal, they don't cause regressions either.