From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26241 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2003 12:51:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26222 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2003 12:51:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (146.82.138.56) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 12:51:16 -0000 Received: from dsl093-172-017.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.172.17] helo=nevyn.them.org ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19RtSr-0002kr-00; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:52:01 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19RtS2-0004Ew-00; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:51:10 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:51:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Andreas Jaeger , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 6 branch, 21st June? Message-ID: <20030616125110.GB16251@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , Andreas Jaeger , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <3EEA6240.4070401@redhat.com> <3EEDBA78.2030609@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EEDBA78.2030609@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00313.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 08:39:20AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >Andrew Cagney writes: > > > > > >>Still scheduled for 21st, how is that looking? > > > > > >We currently have the following results from make check on > >x86_64-linux-gnu: > > > > === gdb Summary === > > > ># of expected passes 8930 > ># of unexpected failures 100 > ># of unexpected successes 4 > ># of expected failures 46 > ># of known failures 23 > ># of unresolved testcases 3 > ># of untested testcases 6 > ># of unsupported tests 1 > >/usr/src/aj/build/gdb/gdb/testsuite/../../gdb/gdb version 2003-06-16-cvs > >-nx > > > > > >How does this look in comparison with other platforms? > > Pretty much on par. break main, run, next definitly works. i386-linux is down at around ten failures. Alpha's a bit higher, sparc's really rotten (thousands). -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer