From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6191 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2003 19:34:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6183 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2003 19:34:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (146.82.138.56) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Jun 2003 19:34:20 -0000 Received: from dsl093-172-017.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.172.17] helo=nevyn.them.org ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19QuKJ-0002bK-00 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 14:35:07 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19QuJW-0006HB-00 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 15:34:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 19:34:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Remote debugging broken for i386 too Message-ID: <20030613193417.GA24067@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20030613192423.GA22712@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030613192423.GA22712@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00263.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 03:24:24PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > The G packet's gone to 0 size. I can't find the message now, but didn't AVR > run into the exact same thing - was that fixed or still being discussed? No, this appears to be a different problem. sizeof_g_packet is fine. The problem is that we do a G packet before our first g packet, i.e. without having ever called remote_fetch_registers. What's supposed to prevent that from happening? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer