Re: gdb/dwarf-frame.c

Roland McGrath
2003-05-09T20:32:16Z

> My understanding from Mark's earlier post is that it is an intentional
> but probably temporary omission - since dwarf-frame is only a week or
> two old at this point.

I want it all and I want it now, dammit! No, wait, wrong attitude module.
That's what I was hoping to hear. Perhaps I can lend a hand to speed up
the process of implementing the rest of it.

> Should any work even be necessary? My understanding was that the
> kernel code would show up in the shared library list. Oh, I guess it
> is - we usually locate .eh_frame via BFD, which means section headers
> and an on-disk file. I see.

Indeedy.

Thanks,
Roland