From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1604 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2003 12:33:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1594 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2003 12:33:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Apr 2003 12:33:10 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 193bEy-00031y-00; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 07:33:16 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 193bEo-0002Ip-00; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 08:33:06 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:33:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jim Blandy Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: dwarf2read.c doesn't produce LOC_COMPUTED_ARG Message-ID: <20030410123305.GA8835@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jim Blandy , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 11:27:27PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: > > I just realized that dwarf2read.c will produce LOC_COMPUTED symbols, > but not LOC_COMPUTED_ARG symbols. The case for > DW_TAG_formal_parameter in new_symbol doesn't call > var_decode_location; it does what it's always done. > > Is there any reason for this, or was it just an oversight? It was just a lack of time, really. We've just recently got a PR about this too. After I check in the location lists patch I'll try to do LOC_COMPUTED_ARG. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer