From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-13278-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 27713 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2003 18:03:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 27692 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2003 18:03:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Apr 2003 18:03:56 -0000
Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail)
	by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 190Q6m-0006SS-00; Tue, 01 Apr 2003 12:03:41 -0600
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 190Q6j-0006I2-00; Tue, 01 Apr 2003 13:03:37 -0500
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 18:03:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>, carlton@math.stanford.edu,
	gdb <gdb@sources.redhat.com>, binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gdb.mi/mi-cli.exp failures
Message-ID: <20030401180337.GA24160@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>,
	Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>, carlton@math.stanford.edu,
	gdb <gdb@sources.redhat.com>, binutils@sources.redhat.com
References: <ro14r5j1g87.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU> <3E88A369.6090403@redhat.com> <3E88AE3F.4030005@redhat.com> <m3brzqzfn5.fsf@workshop.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com> <3E89AB79.1060700@redhat.com> <20030401151809.GA20117@nevyn.them.org> <3E89BCB1.3040900@redhat.com> <20030401163348.GA3830@nevyn.them.org> <3E89C5E5.1020502@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3E89C5E5.1020502@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2

On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 12:01:25PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> >Don't follow... if you add/remove the NULL so that GDB compiles, it
> >should work fine.
> 
> So your expecting developers to hand edit, re-build, re-test against two 
> trees before committing?  That is the only way they can be certain that 
> their GDB change hasn't caused a regression :-/

No, I'm "expecting" for the BFD bug which is causing you to play with
the older BFD version to be fixed.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer