From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9246 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2003 18:28:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9227 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2003 18:28:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2003 18:28:50 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18xv3n-00079n-00; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:30:16 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18xtAG-0004h8-00; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 13:28:48 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:28:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Cc: jimb@redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb.base/scope.exp problems and possible fix Message-ID: <20030325182848.GA18029@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com References: <20030325162929.GG23762@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20030325163931.GB16179@nevyn.them.org> <20030325165139.GJ23762@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20030325173038.GN23762@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030325173038.GN23762@cygbert.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00347.txt.bz2 On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 06:30:38PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:51:39PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 11:39:31AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:29:29PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > But is that workaround a valid fix? > > > > > > I don't think it's completely right, but I have good news for you - I > > > do have a patch that I think _is_ right. I submitted it for review two > > > weeks ago. Would you please try the patch in: > > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-03/msg00286.html > > > and tell me whether it works as well for you? > > > > I tested it on scope.exp and it works fine. Another test on store.exp > > which had related errors is running fine, too. > > > > I've just started a full testsuite run to see if it has any regressions > > in comparison to my patch. I'll report back in an hour or so. > > No regressions! Thanks for testing it! Jim? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer