From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5453 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2003 16:51:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5445 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2003 16:51:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2003 16:51:45 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2PGpiQ21086 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:51:45 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2PGpiQ26017 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:51:44 -0500 Received: from cygbert.vinschen.de (vpn50-10.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.10]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2PGpg505408 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 08:51:43 -0800 Received: (from corinna@localhost) by cygbert.vinschen.de (8.11.6/8.9.3/Linux sendmail 8.9.3) id h2PGpd525652 for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 17:51:39 +0100 Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:51:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb.base/scope.exp problems and possible fix Message-ID: <20030325165139.GJ23762@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20030325162929.GG23762@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20030325163931.GB16179@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030325163931.GB16179@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00341.txt.bz2 Hi Daniel, On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 11:39:31AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:29:29PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > But is that workaround a valid fix? > > I don't think it's completely right, but I have good news for you - I > do have a patch that I think _is_ right. I submitted it for review two > weeks ago. Would you please try the patch in: > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-03/msg00286.html > and tell me whether it works as well for you? I tested it on scope.exp and it works fine. Another test on store.exp which had related errors is running fine, too. I've just started a full testsuite run to see if it has any regressions in comparison to my patch. I'll report back in an hour or so. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Developer Red Hat, Inc. mailto:vinschen@redhat.com