From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: frame->unwind->this_base()
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 22:10:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030316221008.GA19037@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E74F4F4.50003@redhat.com>
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 05:04:36PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> At present there is a per-frame ID method since different frames
> determine their ID using different techniques. The ID (which identifies
> a given frame instance) includes a base and pc/func value.
>
> GDB's frame code also makes available the get_frame_base() method.
> While the default implementation returns get_frame_id().base, I think
> there is going to need to be a per-frame frame->unwind->this_base method.
>
> For dwarf2 frames, it would return, DW_AT_frame_base. For prologue
> frames, it would return an attempt at an equivalent value. Hopefully it
> wouldn't be called for other frame types :-).
>
> It might even be reasonable for a prologue based unwinder to error out
> when asked for the frame's base before the stack frame has been created.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> I should note that dwarf2expr.c contains code that tries to
> locally/directly evaluate the frame base. I think that should instead
> do a get_frame_base() call.
There's no guarantee right now that the DW_AT_frame_base agrees with
the frame's base. I don't even think it's necessary that they be the
same.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-16 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-16 22:04 frame->unwind->this_base() Andrew Cagney
2003-03-16 22:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-03-17 0:09 ` frame->unwind->this_base() Andrew Cagney
2003-03-17 0:14 ` frame->unwind->this_base() Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-17 16:22 ` frame->unwind->this_base() Andrew Cagney
2003-03-17 16:38 ` frame->unwind->this_base() Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-17 16:56 ` frame->unwind->this_base() Andrew Cagney
2003-03-17 17:11 ` frame->unwind->this_base() Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-17 18:20 ` frame->unwind->this_base() Andrew Cagney
2003-03-17 19:35 ` frame->unwind->this_base() Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-18 4:29 ` frame->unwind->this_base() Andrew Cagney
2003-03-18 5:13 ` frame->unwind->this_base() Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-18 15:22 ` frame->unwind->this_base() Andrew Cagney
2003-03-18 16:38 ` frame->unwind->this_base() Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-18 17:02 ` frame->unwind->this_base() Andrew Cagney
2003-03-18 17:11 ` frame->unwind->this_base() Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-18 17:28 ` frame->unwind->this_base() Andrew Cagney
2003-03-18 17:38 ` frame->unwind->this_base() Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-18 20:22 ` frame->unwind->this_base() Andrew Cagney
2003-03-19 14:11 ` frame->unwind->this_base() Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-19 15:24 ` frame->unwind->this_base() Andrew Cagney
2003-03-19 15:32 ` frame->unwind->this_base() Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030316221008.GA19037@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox