From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27136 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2003 19:09:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27129 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2003 19:09:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 11 Mar 2003 19:09:37 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 229BDD34B6; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:09:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 19:09:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Need suggestions on how to test observer.c Message-ID: <20030311190941.GG953@gnat.com> References: <20030310224356.GG972@gnat.com> <20030310232601.GA13541@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030310232601.GA13541@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00163.txt.bz2 > I have no objection to adding these dummies to observer.c; I think I > prefer that, because it tests observer code in the closer to the same > way it will be used. That makes good sense. I'll way for a few more day (say until the end of this week), and then take this approach if nobody objects. Thanks Daniel! -- Joel