From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17355 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2003 05:55:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17335 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2003 05:55:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 11 Mar 2003 05:55:09 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h2B5t5K17176; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 23:55:05 -0600 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 05:55:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200303110555.h2B5t5K17176@duracef.shout.net> To: carlton@math.stanford.edu, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GCC, stabs, mangled names Cc: drow@mvista.com X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00154.txt.bz2 Hi David, > Is there a problem with gcc -gstabs+ and mangled names in recent > GCC's? What do you mean by "recent GCC's"? gcc 3.2.2 and gcc gcc-3_2-branch are fine. I'm getting dozens of new regressions with gcc HEAD -gstabs+, regressions from 2003-02-28 to 2003-03-08. gcc gcc-3_3-branch has a non-stabs regression where programs that include standard header files don't compile (pr gcc/10018). I suspect that most of the people who test gcc test a built, non-installed version, because it shows up quick when I install gcc and set my $PATH to use it. Michael C