From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2021 invoked by alias); 3 Mar 2003 19:04:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2014 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2003 19:04:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2003 19:04:27 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18px7s-0007qP-00; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 15:05:32 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18pvEU-0001W7-00; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 14:04:14 -0500 Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 19:04:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: "gdb_XXX.h" include files Message-ID: <20030303190414.GA5599@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20030303045244.GA8045@nevyn.them.org> <3E63A479.2050009@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E63A479.2050009@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2 On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 01:52:41PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >Andrew, per an earlier conversation, you said this: > > > > > >>I think it would be easier to just clarify the guidelines for > >>``gdb_XXXX.h'' files - that they be independant as they are included by > >>GDB and friends. > > > > > >How'd you feel about documenting this in gdbint.texinfo? Good idea, bad > >idea? > > Pointer to original thread? I was quoting: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-07/msg00162.html Started here: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-06/msg00564.html -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer