From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1078 invoked by alias); 3 Mar 2003 04:52:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1071 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2003 04:52:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2003 04:52:46 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18pjpl-0006TW-00 for ; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 00:53:58 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18phwS-000266-00 for ; Sun, 02 Mar 2003 23:52:44 -0500 Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 04:52:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: "gdb_XXX.h" include files Message-ID: <20030303045244.GA8045@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00041.txt.bz2 Andrew, per an earlier conversation, you said this: > I think it would be easier to just clarify the guidelines for > ``gdb_XXXX.h'' files - that they be independant as they are included by > GDB and friends. How'd you feel about documenting this in gdbint.texinfo? Good idea, bad idea? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer