From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4953 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2003 17:43:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4884 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2003 17:43:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 2 Mar 2003 17:43:29 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id AC4AED34B6; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 09:43:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 17:43:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, cfg@redhat.com, thropej@wasavisystems.com, rjl@sco.com, peter.schauer@regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de Subject: Re: HEADS UP: converting the i386 to the new frame unwinding stuff Message-ID: <20030302174329.GH11181@gnat.com> References: <200303021731.h22HVsEl019548@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200303021731.h22HVsEl019548@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 > However, Interix will need some serious work. The frame methods it > redefines will have to be replaced by *_frame_pc_unwind and > *_frame_id_unwind functions. Should I leave that to you Joel, or > would you like me to write some initial versions and leave the > necessary testing and bug-fixing to you? If you have a rough idea of what the code should look like and you have the time to write them, then that would be very helpful. Otherwise, it's fine to leave this to me. -- Joel