From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23522 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2003 20:57:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23513 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2003 20:57:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 25 Feb 2003 20:57:14 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18no1m-0008Fk-00; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:58:22 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18nm8W-0002dB-00; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 15:57:12 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:57:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Kris Warkentin Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: deferred breakpoints Message-ID: <20030225205711.GA10096@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Kris Warkentin , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <00e001c2dd10$3d4284e0$2a00a8c0@dash> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00e001c2dd10$3d4284e0$2a00a8c0@dash> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00542.txt.bz2 On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 03:55:32PM -0500, Kris Warkentin wrote: > How difficult do you think deferred breakpoints would be to implement? We > have a customer who does a lot of work with shared objects and they'd like > to be able to set breakpoints in them and have them persist across runs. > I'm thinking that creating a list of breakpoints that could be run through > every time a shared object was loaded would do the trick. Can anyone point > out any obvious gotcha's? I'll do you one better - Apple posted patches for this some time ago, they can probably dig out an updated version for you if you inquire. It was called "future break". -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer