From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-12748-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 22022 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2003 16:20:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 22014 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2003 16:20:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 24 Feb 2003 16:20:05 -0000
Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail)
	by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18nNE0-0005LE-00; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 12:21:12 -0600
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18nLKk-0007B4-00; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 11:20:02 -0500
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 16:20:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: ARI `asection' and `sec_ptr'
Message-ID: <20030224162002.GA27574@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>,
	gdb@sources.redhat.com
References: <3E59BF0E.7020708@redhat.com> <20030224142459.GA24793@nevyn.them.org> <3E5A3550.7020700@redhat.com> <20030224151844.GA26127@nevyn.them.org> <3E5A3D85.7000908@redhat.com> <20030224154905.GA26783@nevyn.them.org> <3E5A465D.5040308@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3E5A465D.5040308@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00521.txt.bz2

On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:20:45AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> It also says:
> 
> >A typedef definition should only appear in one include file.
> >
> >An opaque struct declaration can appear in multiple `.h' files. Where 
> >possible, a `.h' file should use an opaque struct declaration instead of 
> >an include.
> 
> That should be clarified further.

Thanks, that was what I was looking for.  I still prefer asection,
since it's the interface that binutils uses in exported interfaces, but
I don't have a strong preference.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer